Embedded

Back to Editors' Blog

Full Networking Offload

by Bryon Moyer

March 28, 2012 at 10:14 AM

Eight months ago, Atheros (now part of Qualcomm) released a WiFi offload chip, their AR4100. It’s part of a push to enable internet-of-things applications with good-to-go 802.11b/g/n connectivity; it includes everything except the antenna. (And NVM, which is cheaper to implement with a second chip.)

They just announced some upgrades to that product, but they’ve also launched a new chip, the 4100P, which adds full networking offload. The 4100P has UDP and IPv4/v6 stacks, freeing up 60-100K of microcontroller NVM since the microcontroller no longer has to worry about this.

Meanwhile, they’ve cut down both the code store (formerly around 38K, now 24-25K) and the working memory requirements (was 11K, is now 8K) for the 4100 drivers.

While the difference between just 802.11 and UDP and IP is mostly handled in software, there apparently are some OTP settings on the chip that are different between the 4100 and the 4100P; the latter is somewhat more than simply the former with different software.

You can find more info in their release

Channels

Communications and Networking. Embedded.

 
    submit to reddit  



Please add a comment

You must be logged in to leave a reply. Login »

Related Articles

Who Controls the Power?

Open Power Foundation Aims to Make PowerPC More Plentiful

by Jim Turley

Once upon a time, there were many little RISC processors frolicking in the deep green microprocessor forest. There was the jaunty little ARM. The bright little SPARC. The mighty little MIPS. The aristocratic little PowerPC. And so many others. They all played and laughed and had ever such a good time.

Then, one by one, the happy little RISC processors started disappearing. Were they gobbled up by the big, bad CISC processor that lurked in the woods? Did they cross over the Wheatstone Bridge and into another land? Or did they just get lost in the tall grass, wandering aimlessly until their mommies and daddies forgot about them? ...

iWatch, You Speculate Incessantly

by Bruce Kleinman, FSVadvisors

I held out as long possible before writing anything iWatch related. The irony is that I am iFatigued with everyone iGuessing about an iUnnanounced product, and yet here I am contributing to the noise. iCaramba! The proverbial last straw: I read a piece comparing Microsofts unannounced wearable to Apples unannounced wearable. OMG.

And AFTER deciding to write this piecebut before I could startanother piece appeared with the declarative headline Heres Everything We Know About the iWatch. And because I cannot make up stuff this good, apparently the things we KNOW include:...

Dont Pass Me By

Project Ara Dev Boards and the Internet of Moving Things

by Amelia Dalton

The pedal is to the metal, our motor is running, and Fish Fry is hitting the open road. At the wheel this week is mCube...

Off to the Android Races

New EEMBC Benchmark Measures Android Speed

by Jim Turley

I dont always benchmark my Android devices. But when I do, I prefer AndEBench-Pro. The Most Boring Man in the WorldBenchmarking,...

And Then There Was One

InvenSense Scoops up Movea, Trusted Positioning

by Bryon Moyer

Once upon a time, roughly a month ago, there were sensor makers, who made sensors and did some amount of their own sensor fusion software,...


Login Required

In order to view this resource, you must log in to our site. Please sign in now.

If you don't already have an acount with us, registering is free and quick. Register now.

Sign In    Register